Skip to main content

Faith in Evolution


As well as being the 500th Anniversary of the birth of John Calvin this year it is also the 200th Anniversary of Charles Darwin, and the 150th Anniversary of his publication of his "On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection" (a snappy title if ever there was one!).

A Methodist studying Calvin's Institutes may be a strange phenomenon, but some would believe that an evangelical studying Behavioural and Evolutionary Genetics, which was the the subject of my honours dissertation in my primary degree, is even more bizarre. I am increasingly dismayed by the tendency within evangelicalism (particularly in America and Northern Ireland) to hold to literal belief in the Genesis creation stories (even though the accounts in Genesis 1 and 2 are "literally" contradictory) and "scientific" creationism, as a touchstone of "soundness". Add to that the tendency of evolutionists such as Dawkins (whose "selfish gene" theory was core to my undergraduate studies) to see faith as the enemy of science, and I sometimes feel that I am standing in a metaphysical no-man's land, often feeling myself to have more in common with faith's harshest critics than with fellow evangelicals.

With that in mind it was a real joy to come across a programme in BBC 4s "Beyond Belief" series, wherein 3 thinkers from the main monotheistic faiths (including Belfast born and avowed evangelical Alister McGrath) reiterated the fact that historically literal creationism has not been a major feature of any of their respective faiths. It is a modern phenomenon, which has become exacerbated by a reaction to secularism in general and secular science in particular. But, again, the fact that this was an exercise in inter-faith dialogue would lead to a lot of despairing head-shaking among some of my more conservative colleagues.

If you would like to listen to the programme, however, it is available on BBC's "this programme will self-destruct in 7 days" iPlayer, but thankfully is also available in the Beyond Belief archive.



Comments

ScatterCode said…
Yes, it was a good show. I was a bit dismayed to come across a letter in the Methodist Newsletter which seemed to be arguing for literal creationism... I'd compose a response, but it wasn't my copy so i don't have the full text of the original.
Yes... Peter Mercer replied, but the subsequent "dialogue" was less than edifying. My tendency with anything like that which appears in the letters column of that illustrious publication (inluding most letters about alcohol, sexuality, and recent goings on in a church not a million miles from me) is generally to shake my head in despair, then console myself with the belief that the majority of the readership will not be with us much longer... Letters published there will rarely change minds... All they can do is flag up the fact that there is an alternative point of view...

Popular posts from this blog

A Woman of no Distinction

Don't often post other people's stuff here... But I found this so powerful that I thought I should. It's a performance poem based on John 4: 4-30, and I have attached the original YouTube video below. A word for women, and men, everywhere... "to be known is to be loved, and to be loved is to be known." I am a woman of no distinction of little importance. I am a women of no reputation save that which is bad. You whisper as I pass by and cast judgmental glances, Though you don’t really take the time to look at me, Or even get to know me. For to be known is to be loved, And to be loved is to be known. Otherwise what’s the point in doing either one of them in the first place? I WANT TO BE KNOWN. I want someone to look at my face And not just see two eyes, a nose, a mouth and two ears; But to see all that I am, and could be all my hopes, loves and fears. But that’s too much to hope for, to wish for, or pray for So I don’t, not anymore. Now I keep to myself And by that

Psalm for Harvest Sunday

A short responsive psalm for us as a call to worship on Harvest Thanksgiving Sunday, and given that it was pouring with rain as I headed into church this morning the first line is an important remembrance that the rain we moan about is an important component of the fruitfulness of the land we live in: You tend the land and water it And the earth produces its abundance. You crown each year with your bounty, and our storehouses overflow with your goodness. The mountain meadows are covered with flocks and the valleys are filled with corn; Your people celebrate your boundless grace They shout for joy and sing. from Psalm 65

Anointed

There has been a lot of chatter on social media among some of my colleagues and others about the liturgical and socio-political niceties of Saturday's coronation and attendant festivities, especially the shielding of the anointing with the pictured spoon - the oldest and perhaps strangest of the coronation artefacts. Personally I thought that was at least an improvement on the cloth of gold canopy used in the previous coronation, but (pointless) debates are raging as to whether this is an ancient practice or was simply introduced in the previous service to shield the Queen from the TV cameras, not for purposes of sacredness, but understandable coyness, if she actually had to bare her breast bone in puritan 1950s Britain. But as any church leader knows, anything performed twice in a church becomes a tradition. All this goes to show that I did actually watch it, while doing other things - the whole shooting match from the pre-service concert with yer wumman in that lemon-